(Post 8)
This post is a response to another blog by Schmetterling (which I recommend to those who are interested in thinking about what makes writing powerful, and which might need to be read to fully understand this post) I'm not going to say anything really different, I just wanted to examine one of the points that stood out to me as having extrodinary value.
So that readers understand that “writing good” is not a grammatically smelly phrase, here is an important and defining segment from Schmetterling's post: “[T]hat a person may write or speak well does not necessarily mean that they write or speak good, and this is the distinction I wish to emphasize.”
Having placed that, this last part of the last paragraph of that post is what I’m basing the majority of this post on because it really struck a chord with me.
"To communicate truth with such clarity and power is a feat of Soul that I can no more than aspire to achieve, but I believe that to do so ought to be the quintessential desire of any person inclined to speak or write."
This was for me the most important thing schmetterling said. I think there is a large difference amongst the categories of writing well (using words in a way that is correct and sometimes pleasing - writing with the mind, as Schmetterling says), writing compellingly (writing in a way that makes people love what you are saying - writing with the heart), and writing powerfully (writing about the things that are a major part of you, that you can thus convey with the power of your soul). All of these things are individual characteristics of "writing good" as laid out by Schmetterling. Additionaly, I believe that these are gradiations of writing... some might take them seperately, but they really do build on each other. Writing with the heart is so much more effective if one can write with the mind - using it to find the words that say what is ment. Writing with the soul can't be accepted or even understood by anyone unless it is written with the heart.
These things are all methods to an end. I wish to aproach the same topic in the reverse. Let us now concentrate on the end. I believe that understanding and seeking the end to which one writes with mind, heart and soul is what causes the development of all three. The heart of writing that which is good is centered in the word truth.
The difference between compelling writing and "writing good" is whether or not the idea being communicated is true. In fact, writing good may not be compelling, and is thus set aside by the average reader because though one wrote good he did not make use of good writing. The result of writing good should possess three qualities that you mentioned: TRUTH conveyed with POWER, and CLARITY. If all words (written or spoken) were designed with this end in mind, then the mind, the heart, and the soul would work themselves out with help from God. Provided that those who wrote and spoke possessed truth, and wanted so much for it to be understood that they learned clarity, and loved it so much that they shared it with power, perfect communication would be the result: those that read and heard would always be compelled to believe truth and to use it. I suppose then that writing good requires an action – the seeking of truth.
What marks the difference between good writers and writers who write good? Good writers are motivated by self-centered objectives – status, pats on the back, great sales, etc. (and generally lack what Schmetterling called soul, because they cater to a soulless popular sentiment). The writers of good seek the edification of their readers. (Schmetterling pegged this one: "Without meaning, without the honest intention to uplift or improve, without Soul, a work is utterly worthless. If a person has nothing to say, they should not speak.") The writers of good want others to understand what truth is, but they know that they can’t teach others about what is without finding it for themselves.
As a general rule, truth can’t be discovered until other known truths are applied. Generally speaking, writing good is the province of good men.
There it is: Write good. Do it with mind, heart, and soul. Learn how by seeking for truth, clarity, and power; especialy truth. Love the truth. Live the truth. Write about the truths you are gathering about you, and become the epitomy of what you write.
-Schlange
I'm just grateful no students have discovered these....
-
.
As part of the class I teach high-school seniors, they each, at some point
in the semester, share two poems from the book by different authors. They...
6 days ago
2 comments:
Good work, Schlange; I liked it. Unfortunately, my computer is telling me that it is currently 1:34am, so thought is--slow just now.
I'll most definitely read your post again later--hopefully at a time when I am more capable of intelligent thought and high comprehension. My only thought at this tired hour is Good work on addressing truth and God; both are indispensable in ANYTHING good.
Kay, so I'm more awake now.
This may surprise you, but the thing you said that most struck me was not one of your main points. I don't think that it's the thing that will strike your other readers the most, but it struck me the most because of what I was thinking when I wrote the post that you're responding to. Whereas I thought of the three qualities building on each other--Mind being the most rudimentary, Heart being in the middle, and Soul being the most transcendent--you pointed out that "Writing with the soul can't be accepted or even understood by anyone unless it is written with the heart." I never considered that, but I think you're absolutely right.
Post a Comment